Prof. Roversi started with his main thesis as a critique of legal positivism by pointing out that designating a legal institution does not depend solely on the practices and declarative speech acts of officials. Therefore, even if P1 and P2 have the same constitutive rules and there is a corresponding rule-following practice, P1 and P2 can be different institutions, because elements such as the so-called background and systematic fallouts influence the ontology of a legal institution. Prof. Roversi then outlined the meaning of the concept of background, saying that it is some sort of “grammar” that exists before the behavior-according-to-the-rules, or a deeper network of desires and beliefs that emerge as a response to basic social needs. On the other hand, systematic fallouts encompass rules, goals and phenomena that are not visible within the deontic powers of an institution.
Center for Legal Fundamentals (CLF) proudly announces Belgrade Legal Philosophy Week 2023 “AI and Law” organised within the ALF (Advancing Cooperation on the Foundations of…
The Judicial Academy in cooperation with the UNDP of Bosnia and Herzegovina, organized a three-day training on the topic: “Criminal protection of the environment”. The training was held from September 20 to 22, 2023 in Konjic, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and was intended for judges, prosecutors, environmental inspectors and police officers of Bosnia and Herzegovina. On the first day of training Prof. Dr. Mirjana Drenovak-Ivanović, Jean Monnet Chair in European Environmental and Climate Change Law, presented research on the role of the Treaty of Lisbon in the development of EU environmental law and the role of the European Court of Justice with reference to the recent practice of the European Court of Human Rights
ALF premises of the Center for Legal Fundamentals (CLF) within the Faculty of Law University of Belgrade have officially been open on the 27 September…
